Pleasant loan encounter in the United States sued the collective network of investors who should pay jessica rabbit

Pleasant loans in the United States suffered a collective prosecution of the net loan investors who should pay attention to what issues Sina fund exposure platform: letter Phi lag behind false propaganda, the performance of long-term lower than similar products, how to buy funds pit? Click [I want to complain], Sina help you expose them! Source: net loan home pleasant loans, which listed on the NYSE in the U.S. P2P net loan platform, because half the share price rose 10 times, especially in the United States company LendingClub shares plunged in the background, as the Internet financial Chinese Guanjue global star. Over the past week, however, the boom has spread. The first is the introduction of new regulations in China net loan day, pleasant loan stock price plummeted more than 20%; after the U.S. market sensitive lawyers act immediately announced last night, will represent the purchase of credit pleasant stock investors, launched a lawsuit against pleasant credit and its executives, beg for justice. Pleasant loan price chart, then what is the end of a good loan in the event, the United States Attorney’s allegations in the end there is no basis? Pleasant loan crisis is currently experiencing, will not have a net impact on the domestic credit net loan investors, if there will be what? Although many domestic incident reports, but today no horse brother of skimming over the surface, to do with the readers deeply exclusive. American lawyer accused of what kind of crime? Yesterday, the New York law firm Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman LLC, published a lawyer advertising, said it was launched in Chinese P2P pleasant net loan lending platform and its executives collective action. The class action will represent investors who bought shares in May 11, 2016 and August 24, 2016. Advertising appeal in October 25th before the registration of investors joined the action group. The most of the reports is relatively simple, no horse brother went out to look for the original file under the firm charges the view, to understand the basic situation, simply say so: the firm charges pleasant loan company, and the two main executives, CEO and CFO in Han Cong Yu issued pleasant credit first quarter earnings from May 11th this year, by August 24th Chinese net loan regulations released during the (class period), through the company’s 2 quarter earnings and other public channels, and loan investors to provide false or misleading information to investors during this period at inflated prices to buy stock in pleasant loans, the new regulations released after the disclosure, pleasant credit slump in this period of time to buy stocks and pleasant credit investors suffered heavy losses. The law on the grounds, requiring the defendant to compensate the losses of investors. The firm is accused of points in collective proceedings, no pleasant loans to the disclosure of the following important facts, or make false or misleading statements, in violation of the U.S. federal securities laws: (1) pleasant loans is encountering increasing customer Piandai behavior. (2) the implementation of the new regulations on anti fraud regulation by the Chinese government will have a negative impact on the pleasant loan business. (3) as a result, pleasant loans to their business, operations and expectations statements are false, misleading or lack of integration相关的主题文章: